Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achmed Labasanov
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 00:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Achmed Labasanov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No significant coverage of the subject. --aktsu (t / c) 08:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I couldn't find any coverage by secondary sources. Theymos (talk) 10:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 05:54, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Week Keep Fought in PRIDE so would pass WP:Athlete sourceable from [1] --Nate1481 12:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - as I wrote here, while he's passing WP:ATHLETE, he does not have "significant coverage by reliable sources independent of the subject". Passing WP:ATHLETE alone does not necessarily establish notability imo (as it says on WP:ATHLETE). Not to say your opinion isn't valid, but just though I should point it out in case you solely based your keep on it as I don't want WP to have thousands of articles mirroring Sherdog's fight finder. --aktsu (t / c) 13:05, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.